<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insurance Claims Investigation News &#187; investigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/tag/investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news</link>
	<description>News and Informaiton about Insurance Claims Investigations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lunacy in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/10/05/lunacy-in-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/10/05/lunacy-in-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers compensation surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado legislators are considering whether to make it harder for workers comp insurers to use video surveillance to ferret out suspicious injury claims. Legislators on an interim committee are looking into the stateâ€™s largest comp insurer, contending Pinnacol Assuranceâ€™s anti-fraud video surveillance was excessive. Pinnacol says its surveillance is legal and often is the key [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/10/05/lunacy-in-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for PA Work Comp Insurers Use of Surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAUPHIN COUNTY REPORTS
121
Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Services, Inc., et al.
Torts â€” Invasion of Privacy â€” Intrusion upon Seclusion â€” Expectation of Privacy
â€” Abuse of Process.
Plaintiff was videotaped by a private investigator who had been hired
to investigate the validity of his workersâ€™ compensation claim for an
alleged work-related injury. He claimed an invasion of privacy because
he was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
