<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insurance Claims Investigation News &#187; insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/tag/insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news</link>
	<description>News and Informaiton about Insurance Claims Investigations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Victory for PA Work Comp Insurers Use of Surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAUPHIN COUNTY REPORTS
121
Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Services, Inc., et al.
Torts â€” Invasion of Privacy â€” Intrusion upon Seclusion â€” Expectation of Privacy
â€” Abuse of Process.
Plaintiff was videotaped by a private investigator who had been hired
to investigate the validity of his workersâ€™ compensation claim for an
alleged work-related injury. He claimed an invasion of privacy because
he was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganclaimspi.com/insurance-investigator-news/2009/08/19/victory-for-pa-work-comp-insurers-use-of-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
